The Macmillan Dictionary defines communication as ‘the process of giving information or making emotions or ideas known to someone’. In the workplace, this process can be complicated by differences in employee backgrounds, attitudes, experience, culture, age, gender, and more. When information or ideas are miscommunicated or misunderstood, a communication gap occurs. Such gaps are especially challenging for managers who “spend 75 to 95 percent of their time communicating”, Pettit D. (1994, P. 4).
Sources of communication gaps
Once source of communication gaps in the workplace is the “grapevine”. This informal communication among employees involves sharing information that may or may not be true. Topics of communication can be sensitive, such as personal details about an employee or corporate rumors about pay or employment status.
Bergin J. (1981, P.80) states that ‘anyone who has worked in a large organization has experienced the aggressions, tensions, and anxieties that infiltrate every office and workshop.’ This has been true for me, as described in the two scenarios that follow. When I was working as a general manager for intercity bus services, a labor union leader misinformed employees that there were insufficient funds to pay monthly salaries. The misinformation created a communication gap that resulted in an employee uprising. In another situation, as deputy manager for Leather Articles Marketing Enterprise, I approved the sale of a dead stock of leather cutting knives. Two days later, leaders of a labor union disseminated rumors that the client who bought the knives resold them for a huge profit. This rumor created a communication gap that was problematic for the organization.
Impact of communication gaps
According to Mamoria,
Remedy for communication gaps
Communication gaps can be minimized by smoothing flows of communication between layers of an organization. This can be accomplished through transparency—by keeping all employees informed, honesty—by sharing the existing reality of organizational issues, and fairness—by providing a culture where all employees are treated fairly.
In the two scenarios of communication gaps cited previously, both were remedied by providing evidence that negated the misinformation. Transparency enabled the misinformation to be openly addressed and honesty allowed information to be presented that proved the communication by labor leaders was false. Mamoria, Gankar and Pareek (2004) states, ‘The information function serves to provide knowledge to individuals needed to guide their actions. It also fulfills workers’ desires for the awareness of things that affect them.’
In summary, to minimize communication gaps in the workplace, there should exist a smooth flow of communication among employees that serves to minimize uncertainty. Jones. R et al, (2010b) states, ‘Uncertainty is a threat to individuals, groups, and the organization as a whole that can interfere with effective performance and goal attainment.’ Therefore, managers should be as transparent as possible, while communicating honestly and fairly to all employees, According to Heller. R (1998), ‘Good communication is the lifeblood of organizations.’